On international and domestic as a result of is different to the common crime connotation and the extension understanding, criminal law educational world to traditional common crime theory in whether includes the common error crime to have the different viewpoint. This article first introduced the criminal law educational world about the common error crime theory dispute, advances together thought the common crime has fact common crime and the legal division of common crime, but but the common error crime belongs to in fact common crime in the non-legal common crime (the latter only to limit together intentionally crime), however, in the real life and the judicial practice, the common error crime already was one not allow to neglect, the objective existence social phenomenon, in particular in some divisions of labor close, mechanized degree development very high profession, some significant accident occurrence is often not by creates personally, but was several human of common errors causes to tallyConstitution important document harm consequence. Must to each common error author determine reasonably when legal responsibility, must consider various authors' behavior motive. Violated in various authors has paid attention to the duty to cause the legal harm result together in the situation, holds the motive who bad, was eager for quick success and immediate gain to be supposed to hold nicely, is favorable he the motive to undertake the many legal responsibility. At the same time, because if the author violated has paid attention to the duty is together the involvement factor causes, then had makes the concrete analysis according to the involvement factor and the harm result close degree. Therefore, the common error crime which already exists to objective on conducts the theoretically research is extremely essential. This article as to the acknowledgment common error crime tenable condition, recognized, determines guilt with questions and so on punishment makes the shallow discussion.
